The show I watched is Bizarre Foods.
I have watched this show in part, once, but
chose it because on the primary channels there were many interruptions of an
amber alert. I am not putting this alert
down, it was on and off so many times, it was hard to watch a show with any
consistency so I went to the Travel channel.
First, I
watched without sound: I was able to
observe that the female was professional but friendly and open to hearing the
questions her male companion was asking.
Our text describes non-verbal communication as “spontaneous and
unintentional” (O’Hair, D. and Weirmann, M., 2009. p.103). As I observed this show without sound, I saw
hand gestures, especially of the male tourist and eye rolling and laughing of
the woman.
What assumptions did you make about
the characters and plot based on the ways in which you interpreted the
communication you observed?
The woman
in the show was friendly, relaxed therefore I assumed that they were working on
a food show project. This woman took him to several restaurants and markets, and
then I turned on the sound, as I wanted to hear what he was saying about the
food. When he was handed the fruit, I
immediately knew what it was without being told. I tasted it in Africa; it had
a different name than what the guide used because of the language difference
but it was the same fruit. She called it Corazon in Spanish, which means heart. We called this fruit “sour soop” and yes, it
was sour and bitter. When he sampled the fruit, it was very distasteful to him. Obviously, by the gesture of his hand and his
face, he did not like it. She was disappointed;
her face showed disappointment, instead she threw her head back and
laughed. I think that I would call this “channel
discrepancy” because she obviously was disappointed but laughed to cover up and
not say something inappropriate. (Adapted from O’Hair & Wiemann, 2009)
Would your assumptions have been
more correct if you had been watching a show you know well?
If I had watched the show regularly, I would have known that she was a guide or if it were another show, I would have been more aware of the relationship of the two.
What do you think the characters’ relationships
are based on the ways in which they are communicating?
The person
narrating the show was traveling to a tropical country to visit. The name of
the country was not evident until I turned the sound on and discovered it was
Puerto Rico. Andrew, the name of the male
had a female travel guide and she was taking him to different markets and
restaurants with native foods. The guide
was open to his remarks of the beauty of the country and the foods. Their relationship appeared to be relaxed and
friendly but professional. Then I turned
the sound on, and that was when he was telling her how much he did not like the
fruit.
What are they feeling and expressing
based on the nonverbal behavior you are observing?
There was a sense of professionalism: relaxed and friendly but
definitely a professional flavor and that is why I thought it might be colleagues
working together on a food project.
Write about your experience in your blog, including what you learned about communication from this experience and insights or “aha” moments you believe would be helpful to your colleagues.
I think that the “aha” moment in this show was when he ate the pig’s
ear. He was surprised, his face reflected
surprise and pleasure. He expressed how
much he liked the taste by verbally and non-verbal expressions. He complemented with his face, his eyes and
his hand gestures. Another example of an
“aha” moment and a non-verbal communication: he was at a family home in a remote
village; after he had eaten, he thanked the younger women but kissed the
grandma on the cheek. Her reaction was
smiles, eyes shining and hands clapping.
Tasting of bizarre foods brought to mind some of the strange, to my
thinking, foods that I ate while in Africa.
Sour soop was one that I just could not tolerate; it was so bitter and
stringy. I did learn to enjoy many of
their foods: and have even made the Mafia Tiga, peanut soup for my
preschoolers. That was a hit: they loved
it. That would be my personal “aha”
moment, when the children ate the peanut soup and loved it and wanted
more.
I have a better understanding of non-verbal communications skills and how they can be misinterperted and that verbal skills are skills to be worked on regularly so as to communicate what it is you are saying without misunderstandings. Life does not exist without communication, determining what kinds of skills you want to work for is the goal that each person has to ask themselves.
Reference:
O'-
Hair, D., & Wiemann, M. (2009). Real communication.
New York: Bedford/St. Martin's.
Barbara,
ReplyDeleteI also found how important all communication skills are. Even the non-verbal ones are an important way for us to express ourselves and if we think about it this is the only way that babies can express themselves so we need to be more aware of its importance.
Barbara,
ReplyDeleteThis is a very interesting show that you watched. I am not a big fan of cable so although I have it I usually stick to the regular channels. I may have to check this bizarre foo out though. When we watch rather than listen things can be heard in a whole new way. This assignment made me think about how deaf people saw or interpreted television before closed captioning. The shows we watched may have been entirely different to them.
Ginny
Hi Barbara, this seemed like a very interesting show. You are right about how people that have the inabilities to hear and how they may interpret information from a movie. Many times the wordings are at the bottom of the screen for the deaf to see what is being said. When we do not hear what is actually going on, we can interrpret things differently according to the non verbal language going on. Nice post.
ReplyDelete